Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-03-04 08:29:01 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

DC v. Heller mentions that the 2nd Amendment is made of two parts: a prefatory clause and an operative clause. The first announces a purpose and is not meant to constrain the second. "A well regulated militia...." therefore doesn't define who can bear arms or not. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/07-290

Written by B79C6466602BF1E769ED7849F6524E8CBBEADF8C080E2C68005AEB40B5C081D9
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1629964651797573635

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1631934762620264450
  • noteId - 1631934762620264450
  • participantId - B79C6466602BF1E769ED7849F6524E8CBBEADF8C080E2C68005AEB40B5C081D9
  • noteAuthorParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1677918541947
  • tweetId - 1629964651797573635
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • DC v. Heller mentions that the 2nd Amendment is made of two parts: a prefatory clause and an operative clause. The first announces a purpose and is not meant to constrain the second. "A well regulated militia...." therefore doesn't define who can bear arms or not. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/07-290

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-03-04 08:29:01 UTC
(1677918541947)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-03-07 02:11:29 UTC
(1678155089929)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-03-07 22:42:01 -0600 00046B9FDBEB4D6EE2A594DFA48D5515CE2AE7CF5ED97A7A0ED84FD634F6544E Rating Details
2023-03-04 10:13:33 -0600 1E63C4F17963B9C5B4489BFDF29FE99946F4AFDBE9F44C5F9A9F6119EB7A78A4 Rating Details
2023-03-04 14:42:19 -0600 45060ED935D102E05C21C743FE433C0B17B27D8FCF69CED01A2AD3F9AB2815B1 Rating Details
2023-03-04 02:54:12 -0600 83FEF76206F4DC8CD9906D9FC71A16E4A82DEDD7EE9EA563D7514F3A82611DA8 Rating Details
2023-03-04 09:16:09 -0600 8580CE2670C27E75C58B5D635D3DBD640A2667EC1730FB19294E136CBDF010FA Rating Details
2023-03-25 13:55:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-04 10:13:33 -0600 Rating Details
2023-03-07 22:42:01 -0600 Rating Details
2023-03-04 14:42:19 -0600 Rating Details
2023-03-04 09:16:09 -0600 Rating Details
2023-03-25 13:55:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-04 02:54:12 -0600 Rating Details