Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-02-28 01:46:03 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The Supreme Court declined to consider a lawsuit on January 9, but the plaintiff, Raland Brunson, filed an appeal on January 23. According to an update on the SCOTUS' website dated Feb 24, 2023 the lawsuit appeal has now been "distributed for conference" https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/supreme-court-hear-case-reinstate-143017080.html

Written by E72B68963607595460B2C1CC0B37FB6351F4EBF6CB64154317884F89470ABFD0
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1630000520466165762

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1630383800319344640
  • noteId - 1630383800319344640
  • participantId - E72B68963607595460B2C1CC0B37FB6351F4EBF6CB64154317884F89470ABFD0
  • noteAuthorParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1677548763720
  • tweetId - 1630000520466165762
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The Supreme Court declined to consider a lawsuit on January 9, but the plaintiff, Raland Brunson, filed an appeal on January 23. According to an update on the SCOTUS' website dated Feb 24, 2023 the lawsuit appeal has now been "distributed for conference" https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/supreme-court-hear-case-reinstate-143017080.html

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-02-28 01:46:03 UTC
(1677548763720)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-03-07 02:11:29 UTC
(1678155089929)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-03-01 13:49:41 -0600 963862AE6FE9D1BD6830068492FC15CD414F0918D6458D6EED352848B0C425A0 Rating Details
2023-02-27 20:06:21 -0600 992932B0527A672C23AE61796C01072F45C13496756A150528BB74653898B6D4 Rating Details
2023-02-27 20:06:21 -0600 Rating Details
2023-03-01 13:49:41 -0600 Rating Details