Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-02-25 04:32:27 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The study referred to is a Cochrane review, summarizing all of the available randomized clinical trials in mask usage to prevent respiratory infection. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6/full The review summarizes that masks offer no clear benefit, and that better quality evidence with low risk of bias is needed.

Written by 3871C986B3C2BCF97D13633DBD3E4A728BFB2C0C9317A7E7E2E70475092E58E0
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1629172116372193281

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1629338513195016192
  • noteId - 1629338513195016192
  • participantId - 3871C986B3C2BCF97D13633DBD3E4A728BFB2C0C9317A7E7E2E70475092E58E0
  • noteAuthorParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1677299547847
  • tweetId - 1629172116372193281
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The study referred to is a Cochrane review, summarizing all of the available randomized clinical trials in mask usage to prevent respiratory infection. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6/full The review summarizes that masks offer no clear benefit, and that better quality evidence with low risk of bias is needed.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-02-25 04:32:27 UTC
(1677299547847)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-03-07 02:11:29 UTC
(1678155089929)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-02-25 00:00:33 -0600 2EBC43B631653F4C5E06EA85FAE00261343984083696E6C2C96DD6771DAF2289 Rating Details
2023-02-25 11:34:48 -0600 45B8EF43682258D990F1C39DD9C1C131E030B7B116A1A874CAD37AED55F98C04 Rating Details
2023-02-25 02:18:21 -0600 47AD3BD4ED0E64C9EA74DB3A322FA6AA5E5F8D84E57A6E405CC624F53C571EC8 Rating Details
2023-02-26 09:13:06 -0600 53898DB17ECDDB8648EEF935CB6A549F98569E6619DAFF240C313863886015F6 Rating Details
2023-02-25 07:02:48 -0600 800C79B962ACCAA202D47CAAD7964A8080C4137EE4A6FD6CE9364052957C6147 Rating Details
2023-02-25 00:09:08 -0600 ADA7A6B861E84F16A9AC3EE64215DB07837986FF7A1CF25A4D643148B37B51E4 Rating Details
2023-02-24 23:13:29 -0600 EE39BB806D85C1257AC923441EFBA93C3F6DDADFE5AD7D9772E64421CE1C6CC8 Rating Details
2023-02-25 03:42:47 -0600 Rating Details
2023-02-25 00:09:08 -0600 Rating Details
2023-02-25 11:34:48 -0600 Rating Details
2023-02-26 09:13:06 -0600 Rating Details
2023-02-25 00:00:33 -0600 Rating Details
2023-02-25 03:42:47 -0600 Rating Details
2023-02-24 23:13:29 -0600 Rating Details
2023-02-25 07:02:48 -0600 Rating Details
2023-02-25 02:18:21 -0600 Rating Details