Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-02-18 15:25:48 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The tweet reports that the CHD is suing the CDC, which is accurate (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/chd-lawsuit-cdc-covid-vaccine-vaers/). Whether or not the CHD’s arguments have merit will be decided by the courts, not Community Notes. In the meantime, the comments section is a good place for discussion/debate.

Written by 992932B0527A672C23AE61796C01072F45C13496756A150528BB74653898B6D4
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1626313191377567748

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1626966219650736128
  • noteId - 1626966219650736128
  • participantId - 992932B0527A672C23AE61796C01072F45C13496756A150528BB74653898B6D4
  • noteAuthorParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1676733948992
  • tweetId - 1626313191377567748
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The tweet reports that the CHD is suing the CDC, which is accurate (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/chd-lawsuit-cdc-covid-vaccine-vaers/). Whether or not the CHD’s arguments have merit will be decided by the courts, not Community Notes. In the meantime, the comments section is a good place for discussion/debate.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-02-18 15:25:48 UTC
(1676733948992)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-03-07 02:11:29 UTC
(1678155089929)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-02-28 03:32:39 -0600 1734DE71B9DD2C037A40D898018AE76D2D634FE0C44E5B01894154A482BA9D88 Rating Details
2023-02-18 10:34:45 -0600 2A4169EE19A8A01657FC32ACA31E49627C4645D25E9BB4924CCFEEF066D6E9DD Rating Details
2023-02-18 10:27:00 -0600 74B96EA9757CC8DB8C9E1FE2EF8DACD8349980C2D5B8A06D112D7F328DD3E591 Rating Details
2023-02-18 13:41:43 -0600 7DAF7E766C91C4681BD9E35A65ED1244CD021FD7E551BF6AB85D6DF31D7EAC10 Rating Details
2023-02-21 08:35:05 -0600 8259FBF12268987C583D1AB569D227FDB3AC3304A5AAC984E238767677F2C921 Rating Details
2023-02-20 19:36:35 -0600 97BA278ED28250BF11103CB9464DDB39E1949B2726B6989F32E5487DCB66586D Rating Details
2023-02-18 18:21:37 -0600 B289B7B9A72A2B21A5016714B5CFECC892B67D4EF528AD49D229201250F7B83A Rating Details
2023-02-18 09:29:09 -0600 C378931E048482D2BFDF00DC95644D6377CBCB812C79FF87D77B5E48595B3DA3 Rating Details
2023-02-18 09:32:34 -0600 C966E0BA5803EDA2B9ADEA1A226B5D5FB13629349A2D9A920F01C5137F8AF13B Rating Details
2023-02-19 09:50:31 -0600 Rating Details
2023-02-18 09:32:34 -0600 Rating Details
2023-02-18 10:34:45 -0600 Rating Details
2023-02-18 09:29:09 -0600 Rating Details
2023-02-28 03:32:39 -0600 Rating Details
2023-02-19 09:50:31 -0600 Rating Details
2023-02-18 13:41:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-02-18 18:21:37 -0600 Rating Details
2023-02-18 10:27:00 -0600 Rating Details
2023-02-20 19:36:35 -0600 Rating Details
2023-02-21 08:35:05 -0600 Rating Details