Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-01-01 18:28:49 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This tweet makes an extreme claim regarding the tweet it is in response to with no presented relevance, rationale, or evidence, nor is any generally known.

Written by 17A2F32B4EF663C2955B5C334E75EEB28E3906585AF98E4FAA55B175F2F6B5F4
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1609309069952815104

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1609617656453402626
  • noteId - 1609617656453402626
  • participantId - 17A2F32B4EF663C2955B5C334E75EEB28E3906585AF98E4FAA55B175F2F6B5F4
  • noteAuthorParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1672597729205
  • tweetId - 1609309069952815104
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 1
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • This tweet makes an extreme claim regarding the tweet it is in response to with no presented relevance, rationale, or evidence, nor is any generally known.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-03-24 01:34:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-24 01:34:33 -0500 Rating Details