Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2022-12-06 16:25:44 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

303 Creative and owner Lorie Smith was not taken to court for her anti-gay business practices but pre-emptively sued in a case of imagined persecution. Smith was never warned, fined, or impacted and her claims admitted to be hypothetical. https://www.newsweek.com/supreme-court-hear-case-web-designer-refusing-do-gay-wedding-sites-1763759

Written by 9143B7A4D5E94342EE6CCBE5C9BFF329A0433B9034009B49BCC52396CBE2AF45
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1599780115931537410

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1600164599919251456
  • noteId - 1600164599919251456
  • participantId - 9143B7A4D5E94342EE6CCBE5C9BFF329A0433B9034009B49BCC52396CBE2AF45
  • noteAuthorParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1670343944895
  • tweetId - 1599780115931537410
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • 303 Creative and owner Lorie Smith was not taken to court for her anti-gay business practices but pre-emptively sued in a case of imagined persecution. Smith was never warned, fined, or impacted and her claims admitted to be hypothetical. https://www.newsweek.com/supreme-court-hear-case-web-designer-refusing-do-gay-wedding-sites-1763759

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2022-12-06 16:25:44 UTC
(1670343944895)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2022-12-07 02:16:04 UTC
(1670379364565)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
9143B7A4D5E94342EE6CCBE5C9BFF329A0433B9034009B49BCC52396CBE2AF45

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2022-12-06 17:43:31 -0600 3437C70B303DFB779540D71BAD1927181691424AAD1916C79E362F4332FD0626 Rating Details
2022-12-06 14:11:32 -0600 464F514091F013106E190C712492FDDD7A2F35D38B0E762F31374CC21B9FD858 Rating Details
2022-12-06 12:51:08 -0600 4EA541A52F0A2FFA141E9EEC01E8F1EDC92ECAF672EC87DAB3D3CC1557A7AFD0 Rating Details
2022-12-06 13:56:38 -0600 5EDC2B8BBEA2C25FBA40E8849AF6DD751A4AE52F674E4E2311C09F82909AD4F8 Rating Details
2022-12-06 14:15:39 -0600 6C7FC91BC3036C098C9CCF40AB6025DA5FEFA316E45ECE3DE0D9C297CA87DB63 Rating Details
2022-12-08 01:28:55 -0600 75640F2D508337E7439D9B45BDCB4BDC2EA68A177E4596486D33A667FA183DCD Rating Details
2022-12-06 11:39:06 -0600 7DAF7E766C91C4681BD9E35A65ED1244CD021FD7E551BF6AB85D6DF31D7EAC10 Rating Details
2022-12-06 15:28:53 -0600 80180BE04F4D827BD39572866F1761E99F244CCFBEEE79B9CD8F09F8E7874BAF Rating Details
2022-12-06 15:57:55 -0600 8463884C3798762F674651A8D820016234775A26161F7C35CB051F80851173C5 Rating Details
2022-12-06 19:39:21 -0600 9736DF42171A999208E640D9616E3AF1D2219C9694E38F806D374F891F58485E Rating Details
2022-12-06 14:13:35 -0600 A30E23B01F927C4387616E33DE422C96B4F9A9B45B8ACA619267391F3D77B5A8 Rating Details
2022-12-06 12:02:58 -0600 B5E3F5B6C5C11C0E66FE96664AEB86BFA61E3C124AAC76A60AD08C94671CDEE1 Rating Details
2022-12-06 10:55:34 -0600 BF9A211DEE87A7A6BF1616BF0477878C3FC24936B0EC5C89BF49005808A85E3E Rating Details
2022-12-06 15:15:22 -0600 ED631A047550482645D6AF42E75C31CF2FE81AC9C6220396E1657D510F2C2F7C Rating Details
2022-12-06 15:28:53 -0600 Rating Details
2022-12-06 15:15:22 -0600 Rating Details
2022-12-06 10:55:34 -0600 Rating Details
2022-12-08 01:28:55 -0600 Rating Details
2022-12-06 19:39:21 -0600 Rating Details
2022-12-06 14:15:39 -0600 Rating Details
2022-12-06 11:39:06 -0600 Rating Details
2022-12-06 17:43:31 -0600 Rating Details
2022-12-06 14:13:35 -0600 Rating Details
2022-12-06 14:11:32 -0600 Rating Details
2022-12-06 15:57:55 -0600 Rating Details
2022-12-06 13:56:38 -0600 Rating Details
2022-12-06 12:51:08 -0600 Rating Details
2022-12-06 12:02:58 -0600 Rating Details