Birdwatch Note
2022-09-28 22:07:34 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
In both the Texas and Connecticut default judgment civil cases, Jones and his attorneys decided not to present a First Amendment legal defense, even though they could have. https://firstamendmentwatch.org/what-does-the-alex-jones-case-mean-for-the-first-amendment-and-disinformation-leading-scholars-lawyers-provide-analysis/ Defamation, which were both civil lawsuits, is generally not protected speech. https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/997/libel-and-slander https://constitutionallawreporter.com/amendment-01/freedom-speech/defamation/#:~:text=Defamation%20has%20always%20acted%20as,protected%20under%20the%20First%20Amendment.
Written by 9795BF8962792425EFA8D2F4F92685B4
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1574457780022509573
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1575245861524836352
- noteId - 1575245861524836352
- participantId - 9795BF8962792425EFA8D2F4F92685B4
- noteAuthorParticipantId -
- createdAtMillis - 1664402854698
- tweetId - 1574457780022509573
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable - BELIEVABLE_BY_MANY
- harmful - CONSIDERABLE_HARM
- validationDifficulty - EASY
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- In both the Texas and Connecticut default judgment civil cases, Jones and his attorneys decided not to present a First Amendment legal defense, even though they could have. https://firstamendmentwatch.org/what-does-the-alex-jones-case-mean-for-the-first-amendment-and-disinformation-leading-scholars-lawyers-provide-analysis/ Defamation, which were both civil lawsuits, is generally not protected speech. https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/997/libel-and-slander https://constitutionallawreporter.com/amendment-01/freedom-speech/defamation/#:~:text=Defamation%20has%20always%20acted%20as,protected%20under%20the%20First%20Amendment.
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2022-09-28 22:07:34 UTC (1664402854698) |
2022-10-03 07:40:33 UTC (1664782833375) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2022-10-03 07:40:33 UTC (1664782833375) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 2022-10-03 07:40:33 UTC (1664782833375) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 9795BF8962792425EFA8D2F4F92685B4 |
2022-09-28 22:07:34 UTC (1664402854698) |
2022-10-03 07:40:33 UTC (1664782833375) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2022-10-03 07:40:33 UTC (1664782833375) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 2022-10-03 07:40:33 UTC (1664782833375) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 47AD3BD4ED0E64C9EA74DB3A322FA6AA5E5F8D84E57A6E405CC624F53C571EC8 |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2022-09-29 17:07:41 -0500 | 31D02A6B94EC22720980EA64F8CF337B9823EE080CB256D8FC2634EEEE36F040 | Rating Details |
2022-09-29 05:29:00 -0500 | 33B824DC0F5D552E7F3C29566E5156295F07099345D2EB3F7ADE8805BCC41826 | Rating Details |
2022-09-28 18:28:59 -0500 | 51CF24E741A18508E181F80408E6E7E109FDDE98B31A9F11F05480731FF485A6 | Rating Details |
2022-09-28 23:45:53 -0500 | 58E8C0673ADD52DA3A2F5251341F4C433788CF63512B12604CC9A24C7BFC23F7 | Rating Details |
2022-09-29 13:13:41 -0500 | 5F3B8ADE27A92DD4C07C1E8F5C1EC8940AD1E6A751382BD0A3E93371300335FA | Rating Details |
2022-09-30 20:56:46 -0500 | 94CD19EF292A26A153CAE826E4CDC6F4759B42753EA2382090D83DEDB5223AF1 | Rating Details |
2022-09-29 02:03:35 -0500 | 98D8319CF00FF86895E7E8055E5BC6976E94DBD9AA49EDD7F395F81FB2F9AC2D | Rating Details |
2022-09-29 09:18:22 -0500 | 9B497FC09D4E26C7C1859DE78F213650C718D980F2EB4589CF59D235E3C5BE93 | Rating Details |
2022-09-30 13:02:55 -0500 | 9C1A980332A30BD29E2A58CC3492652436CDCEDF27639505968AF84E57A500F7 | Rating Details |
2022-09-28 21:05:07 -0500 | A30E23B01F927C4387616E33DE422C96B4F9A9B45B8ACA619267391F3D77B5A8 | Rating Details |
2022-09-29 08:01:43 -0500 | A3CF659E75560EB707B9D386A13C3F7859DF21FCC0A19F56BA56D15A96B11A8B | Rating Details |
2022-09-29 00:01:06 -0500 | C41EE02BB8359EDA221E6B534CE145C7C569815D3335313FFE5C1D39DD31AECC | Rating Details |
2022-10-01 22:11:41 -0500 | E7CB7F113A8D5CD5880530D36916A852647718CB6EAECF368B76C15030396C72 | Rating Details |
2022-09-29 04:54:41 -0500 | F434B8804351E4E29497F147D7C4BCAA12218464196E231313A8DB6BED9B901E | Rating Details |
2022-09-30 16:34:35 -0500 | FCE7F035C82EEE4DC4745E5A85B40BCA27FA681B6028E21EF7B68EB36AA75DC3 | Rating Details |
2022-09-29 13:13:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2022-09-28 23:45:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2022-09-30 16:34:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2022-09-29 05:29:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2022-09-29 08:01:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2022-09-30 20:56:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2022-10-01 22:11:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2022-09-29 09:18:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2022-09-29 02:03:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2022-09-29 04:54:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2022-09-28 21:05:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2022-09-28 18:28:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2022-09-29 00:01:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2022-09-30 13:02:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2022-09-29 17:07:41 -0500 | Rating Details |