Birdwatch Note
2022-06-24 20:10:56 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
A "5-4 vote"? Yes: A single Mississippi law (forbidding some abortions) was upheld. 3 Justices dissented from that *result*. https://thedialog.org/featured/u-s-supreme-court-ruling-in-dobbs-v-jackson-knocks-down-roe-v-wade-returns-abortion-issue-to-states/ https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf But CJ Roberts voted to preserve *only* that law. He did *not* agree that prohibition of abortion is constitutional. https://www.npr.org/2022/06/24/1102305878/supreme-court-abortion-roe-v-wade-decision-overturn *That* part was "5-4".
Written by EF0A6CAC8189EF888C4B1BF56256A98B
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1540339248917893120
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1540427275535110147
- noteId - 1540427275535110147
- participantId - EF0A6CAC8189EF888C4B1BF56256A98B
- noteAuthorParticipantId -
- createdAtMillis - 1656101456898
- tweetId - 1540339248917893120
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- A "5-4 vote"? Yes: A single Mississippi law (forbidding some abortions) was upheld. 3 Justices dissented from that *result*. https://thedialog.org/featured/u-s-supreme-court-ruling-in-dobbs-v-jackson-knocks-down-roe-v-wade-returns-abortion-issue-to-states/ https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf But CJ Roberts voted to preserve *only* that law. He did *not* agree that prohibition of abortion is constitutional. https://www.npr.org/2022/06/24/1102305878/supreme-court-abortion-roe-v-wade-decision-overturn *That* part was "5-4".
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2022-06-24 20:10:56 UTC (1656101456898) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
EF0A6CAC8189EF888C4B1BF56256A98B | |||
| 2022-06-24 20:10:56 UTC (1656101456898) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
B4F51ECCD5C22CA574835FF31FEC0522A98B9ADB1F7001E2355AB431126515F5 |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2022-06-24 16:14:21 -0500 | 0C91900F7892D8DA899BB85193A8758A | Rating Details |
| 2022-06-24 16:14:21 -0500 | A30E23B01F927C4387616E33DE422C96B4F9A9B45B8ACA619267391F3D77B5A8 | Rating Details |
| 2022-06-24 16:14:21 -0500 | Rating Details |