Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2022-06-10 04:32:44 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

What the Court is saying is that there are alternative ways for the victim to seek redress (maybe not ideal but they do exist) and if better ways to handle such claims against border patrol officers exist, Congress should be the one to decide that, not unelected judges https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/08/politics/supreme-court-border-patrol-agents/index.html

Written by 63FF70B433650BD66FB590926D7AA793
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1535117736703148032
• noteId - 1535117736703148032
• participantId - 63FF70B433650BD66FB590926D7AA793
• noteAuthorParticipantId -
• createdAtMillis - 1654835564197
• tweetId - 1534722484280381440
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable - BELIEVABLE_BY_MANY
• harmful - LITTLE_HARM
• validationDifficulty - CHALLENGING
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• What the Court is saying is that there are alternative ways for the victim to seek redress (maybe not ideal but they do exist) and if better ways to handle such claims against border patrol officers exist, Congress should be the one to decide that, not unelected judges https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/08/politics/supreme-court-border-patrol-agents/index.html