Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2022-06-10 00:20:19 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

In Egbert v Boule, SCOTUS found the 4th amendment claims did not meet the criteria for government civil liability (Bivens Test) and declined to extend new liability to 1st amendment claims. Existing 1A & 4A protections are not impacted. Border zone is defined by 8 CFR 287 https://twitter.com/mjs_dc/status/1534536335037456386 https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/bivens_actions https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/8/287.1

Written by A87524982D71DEDE3399EB34174E1E0A
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1534880961732780033

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1535054213696331790
  • noteId - 1535054213696331790
  • participantId - A87524982D71DEDE3399EB34174E1E0A
  • noteAuthorParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1654820419193
  • tweetId - 1534880961732780033
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable - BELIEVABLE_BY_MANY
  • harmful - LITTLE_HARM
  • validationDifficulty - CHALLENGING
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • In Egbert v Boule, SCOTUS found the 4th amendment claims did not meet the criteria for government civil liability (Bivens Test) and declined to extend new liability to 1st amendment claims. Existing 1A & 4A protections are not impacted. Border zone is defined by 8 CFR 287 https://twitter.com/mjs_dc/status/1534536335037456386 https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/bivens_actions https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/8/287.1

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2022-06-10 00:20:19 UTC
(1654820419193)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
0970AF2EDBB2160765D64BA2ADD89F73D654E9F9EC01C4671E82A8F98561183F
2022-06-10 00:20:19 UTC
(1654820419193)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
A87524982D71DEDE3399EB34174E1E0A

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2022-06-10 02:52:51 -0500 103948F8917F8D729D2D9BD56CE4EC78E9A50E7975CA6A202562346EEA5CD7B6 Rating Details
2022-06-09 19:25:58 -0500 306C001FB157171615E1F826F2B1DC71 Rating Details
2022-06-09 19:25:58 -0500 7ACFC241269ACF463C8AFEC7B840E5BE0F5AD92BBFA3C42757299F9311499390 Rating Details
2022-06-10 02:52:51 -0500 BA603266C30323DD071E7D1287E56C39 Rating Details
2022-06-10 02:52:51 -0500 Rating Details
2022-06-09 19:25:58 -0500 Rating Details