Birdwatch Note
2022-06-10 00:20:19 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
In Egbert v Boule, SCOTUS found the 4th amendment claims did not meet the criteria for government civil liability (Bivens Test) and declined to extend new liability to 1st amendment claims. Existing 1A & 4A protections are not impacted. Border zone is defined by 8 CFR 287 https://twitter.com/mjs_dc/status/1534536335037456386 https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/bivens_actions https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/8/287.1
Written by A87524982D71DEDE3399EB34174E1E0A
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1534880961732780033
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1535054213696331790
- noteId - 1535054213696331790
- participantId - A87524982D71DEDE3399EB34174E1E0A
- noteAuthorParticipantId -
- createdAtMillis - 1654820419193
- tweetId - 1534880961732780033
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable - BELIEVABLE_BY_MANY
- harmful - LITTLE_HARM
- validationDifficulty - CHALLENGING
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- In Egbert v Boule, SCOTUS found the 4th amendment claims did not meet the criteria for government civil liability (Bivens Test) and declined to extend new liability to 1st amendment claims. Existing 1A & 4A protections are not impacted. Border zone is defined by 8 CFR 287 https://twitter.com/mjs_dc/status/1534536335037456386 https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/bivens_actions https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/8/287.1
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2022-06-10 00:20:19 UTC (1654820419193) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
0970AF2EDBB2160765D64BA2ADD89F73D654E9F9EC01C4671E82A8F98561183F | |||
2022-06-10 00:20:19 UTC (1654820419193) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
A87524982D71DEDE3399EB34174E1E0A |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2022-06-10 02:52:51 -0500 | 103948F8917F8D729D2D9BD56CE4EC78E9A50E7975CA6A202562346EEA5CD7B6 | Rating Details |
2022-06-09 19:25:58 -0500 | 306C001FB157171615E1F826F2B1DC71 | Rating Details |
2022-06-09 19:25:58 -0500 | 7ACFC241269ACF463C8AFEC7B840E5BE0F5AD92BBFA3C42757299F9311499390 | Rating Details |
2022-06-10 02:52:51 -0500 | BA603266C30323DD071E7D1287E56C39 | Rating Details |
2022-06-10 02:52:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2022-06-09 19:25:58 -0500 | Rating Details |