Birdwatch Note
2022-05-09 23:12:26 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This is a previous debunked story. The Supreme Court did not consider the circumstances of the plaintiff’s pregnancy when ruling on the case. Jane Roe's lawyers never mentioned an alleged rape in court, and it formed no part of their legal argument. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/may/06/facebook-posts/contrary-claim-rape-never-mentioned-roe-v-wade-pro/ https://apnews.com/article/archive-fact-checking-5473330059 https://www.vanityfair.com/news/politics/2013/02/norma-mccorvey-roe-v-wade-abortion
Written by 306C001FB157171615E1F826F2B1DC71
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1521666734914256897
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1523803109977321477
- noteId - 1523803109977321477
- participantId - 306C001FB157171615E1F826F2B1DC71
- noteAuthorParticipantId -
- createdAtMillis - 1652137946968
- tweetId - 1521666734914256897
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable - BELIEVABLE_BY_MANY
- harmful - CONSIDERABLE_HARM
- validationDifficulty - EASY
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This is a previous debunked story. The Supreme Court did not consider the circumstances of the plaintiff’s pregnancy when ruling on the case. Jane Roe's lawyers never mentioned an alleged rape in court, and it formed no part of their legal argument. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/may/06/facebook-posts/contrary-claim-rape-never-mentioned-roe-v-wade-pro/ https://apnews.com/article/archive-fact-checking-5473330059 https://www.vanityfair.com/news/politics/2013/02/norma-mccorvey-roe-v-wade-abortion
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2022-05-09 23:12:26 UTC (1652137946968) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
306C001FB157171615E1F826F2B1DC71 | ||
| 2022-05-09 23:12:26 UTC (1652137946968) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
7ACFC241269ACF463C8AFEC7B840E5BE0F5AD92BBFA3C42757299F9311499390 |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2022-05-10 05:43:04 -0500 | 082D7880988D60E41363C038B7319A83F8F316B2655E08364AE3752EA34C9EC7 | Rating Details |
| 2022-05-10 04:57:12 -0500 | 0BF9606538356AC033598757CF87B079C01B51A1175A1F0D1329F9B46F76469A | Rating Details |
| 2022-05-10 06:21:30 -0500 | 0C91900F7892D8DA899BB85193A8758A | Rating Details |
| 2022-05-10 15:18:06 -0500 | 3ACA22B4CAA1B8E9CB14CEB6843CB2CE171169635F08A6DEE7D896EA346A6CB2 | Rating Details |
| 2022-05-10 05:43:04 -0500 | 653B409E42F31999DE09A24D3B37BC0E | Rating Details |
| 2022-05-10 06:21:30 -0500 | A30E23B01F927C4387616E33DE422C96B4F9A9B45B8ACA619267391F3D77B5A8 | Rating Details |
| 2022-05-09 19:06:38 -0500 | B7E4290D734D3C74794D32534047AC8A8923FCD40B96214F87D9259EFF30DF31 | Rating Details |
| 2022-05-10 04:57:12 -0500 | C6ED76D853CCB2D87E7CE083330CA3F5 | Rating Details |
| 2022-05-09 19:06:38 -0500 | DEDBE4198E75E5F1588BF5178F289206 | Rating Details |
| 2022-05-10 15:18:06 -0500 | F9019264E8865453A1EF8F4496689A8D | Rating Details |
| 2022-05-10 15:18:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2022-05-10 04:57:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2022-05-10 06:21:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2022-05-10 05:43:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2022-05-09 19:06:38 -0500 | Rating Details |