Birdwatch Note
2022-04-28 05:46:49 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
There is no evidence that Eric Swalwell had a sexual relationship with a Chinese spy, and the FBI never suspected him of wrongdoing when the Chinese operative Fang Fang infiltrated several Democratic campaigns. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/12/11/what-we-know-about-rep-eric-swalwells-ties-an-alleged-chinese-spy/
Written by C885DE724482C7FF4DEEF7AD09BC4486
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1519218883403472896
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1519553703434330113
- noteId - 1519553703434330113
- participantId - C885DE724482C7FF4DEEF7AD09BC4486
- noteAuthorParticipantId -
- createdAtMillis - 1651124809498
- tweetId - 1519218883403472896
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable - BELIEVABLE_BY_MANY
- harmful - CONSIDERABLE_HARM
- validationDifficulty - EASY
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- There is no evidence that Eric Swalwell had a sexual relationship with a Chinese spy, and the FBI never suspected him of wrongdoing when the Chinese operative Fang Fang infiltrated several Democratic campaigns. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/12/11/what-we-know-about-rep-eric-swalwells-ties-an-alleged-chinese-spy/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2022-04-28 05:46:49 UTC (1651124809498) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
C885DE724482C7FF4DEEF7AD09BC4486 | |||
| 2022-04-28 05:46:49 UTC (1651124809498) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
08FB3FF7669A8CBB26962C12D2AB81D9C156B0685436394B307DF410F2BFCC20 |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2022-04-28 11:59:58 -0500 | 0C91900F7892D8DA899BB85193A8758A | Rating Details |
| 2022-04-28 21:43:45 -0500 | 31E16B73B690A6CD98343140EFBFC2CB | Rating Details |
| 2022-04-28 11:59:58 -0500 | A30E23B01F927C4387616E33DE422C96B4F9A9B45B8ACA619267391F3D77B5A8 | Rating Details |
| 2022-04-28 11:47:04 -0500 | A84AA3A3FC3FE00B63B4F46AF5F0F4F5 | Rating Details |
| 2022-04-28 11:47:04 -0500 | D6705115CDFB246EDF2BBBE5331C5DDCAC526BC1D202FE33BD5A97C3F6F12694 | Rating Details |
| 2022-04-28 21:43:45 -0500 | F301B33105C62D9986F3B992EA25CFE4AA4CB63FADF27A9590BEB084C9F89DF1 | Rating Details |
| 2022-04-28 21:43:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2022-04-28 11:47:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2022-04-28 11:59:58 -0500 | Rating Details |