Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2021-04-16 13:23:24 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Congresswoman Omar claims a Supreme Court seat was stolen; in fact, the Constitutional process was followed. Not liking the outcome of a process is not the same as that process being subverted; this claim could contribute to further unrest and division. Cf. https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/full-text; https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/faq_general.aspx#:~:text=The%20President%20nominates%20someone%20for,composition%20of%20the%20Supreme%20Court.

Written by DCB0650C82A4D6685F127BDC1446A476
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1354238360437596168

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1383048382038573060
  • noteId - 1383048382038573060
  • participantId - DCB0650C82A4D6685F127BDC1446A476
  • noteAuthorParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1618579404732
  • tweetId - 1354238360437596168
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable - BELIEVABLE_BY_MANY
  • harmful - CONSIDERABLE_HARM
  • validationDifficulty - EASY
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Congresswoman Omar claims a Supreme Court seat was stolen; in fact, the Constitutional process was followed. Not liking the outcome of a process is not the same as that process being subverted; this claim could contribute to further unrest and division. Cf. https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/full-text; https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/faq_general.aspx#:~:text=The%20President%20nominates%20someone%20for,composition%20of%20the%20Supreme%20Court.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2021-04-16 13:23:24 UTC
(1618579404732)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
1CB0DA94A4611805D9CE3F6DDE452C488AA48916EE8851554344A092EF3A3B75
2021-04-16 13:23:24 UTC
(1618579404732)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
DCB0650C82A4D6685F127BDC1446A476

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2022-12-05 12:45:11 -0600 08B9EFA13F35E77CC0D497B701504CC4FE80AC8DCE04FEF4DDBA5D645BE82258 Rating Details
2021-04-16 12:44:51 -0500 29927B07D0EE89F19DED97265F0CA9DFAD51148414C6C9DEC592E21DF90DCACF Rating Details
2021-04-16 12:44:51 -0500 DE8C4D375F6CACCFDD1C659DD41BAD4E Rating Details
2021-04-16 12:44:51 -0500 Rating Details
2022-12-05 12:45:11 -0600 Rating Details