Birdwatch Note
2021-04-16 13:23:24 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Congresswoman Omar claims a Supreme Court seat was stolen; in fact, the Constitutional process was followed. Not liking the outcome of a process is not the same as that process being subverted; this claim could contribute to further unrest and division. Cf. https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/full-text; https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/faq_general.aspx#:~:text=The%20President%20nominates%20someone%20for,composition%20of%20the%20Supreme%20Court.
Written by DCB0650C82A4D6685F127BDC1446A476
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1354238360437596168
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1383048382038573060
- noteId - 1383048382038573060
- participantId - DCB0650C82A4D6685F127BDC1446A476
- noteAuthorParticipantId -
- createdAtMillis - 1618579404732
- tweetId - 1354238360437596168
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable - BELIEVABLE_BY_MANY
- harmful - CONSIDERABLE_HARM
- validationDifficulty - EASY
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Congresswoman Omar claims a Supreme Court seat was stolen; in fact, the Constitutional process was followed. Not liking the outcome of a process is not the same as that process being subverted; this claim could contribute to further unrest and division. Cf. https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/full-text; https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/faq_general.aspx#:~:text=The%20President%20nominates%20someone%20for,composition%20of%20the%20Supreme%20Court.
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2021-04-16 13:23:24 UTC (1618579404732) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
1CB0DA94A4611805D9CE3F6DDE452C488AA48916EE8851554344A092EF3A3B75 | |||
2021-04-16 13:23:24 UTC (1618579404732) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
DCB0650C82A4D6685F127BDC1446A476 |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2022-12-05 12:45:11 -0600 | 08B9EFA13F35E77CC0D497B701504CC4FE80AC8DCE04FEF4DDBA5D645BE82258 | Rating Details |
2021-04-16 12:44:51 -0500 | 29927B07D0EE89F19DED97265F0CA9DFAD51148414C6C9DEC592E21DF90DCACF | Rating Details |
2021-04-16 12:44:51 -0500 | DE8C4D375F6CACCFDD1C659DD41BAD4E | Rating Details |
2021-04-16 12:44:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2022-12-05 12:45:11 -0600 | Rating Details |