Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-12 20:57:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CE4DC16E26684A6255BF14FFAD73922DB522E3829A5ABF8CDD64F03EA05FEADB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The specifics and conclusions on what would or would not be covered in this fluid situation for which all the info is not available to make such conclusory remarks. Take it to the comment section for your legal predications/textual interpretation of regulations. No note needed

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1634998713000009728
  • participantId - CE4DC16E26684A6255BF14FFAD73922DB522E3829A5ABF8CDD64F03EA05FEADB
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678654665758
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1634998713000009728CE4DC16E26684A6255BF14FFAD73922DB522E3829A5ABF8CDD64F03EA05FEADB