Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-12 04:25:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1985B51BF791D7228FC2673F10E694ECEFA98850915690FB18C142F832666F4D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The statement from the editor of cochrane library did not state that there was fraud of any kind in the published review. https://t.co/NJMFw5mhbr They stated that the summary findings were misrepresented by others, the findings themselves are still entirely accurate

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1634690673701163008
  • participantId - 1985B51BF791D7228FC2673F10E694ECEFA98850915690FB18C142F832666F4D
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678595105988
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16346906737011630081985B51BF791D7228FC2673F10E694ECEFA98850915690FB18C142F832666F4D