Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-11 16:15:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 81FE9D7D2F668CA266451363352D22DBEFD24221ED5A9EB621D5542E5311974D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is accurately describing the living meta analysis at https://c19ivm.org/. Merely posting a competing study does not refute or add useful context to this factual claim.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1634586420034830336
  • participantId - 81FE9D7D2F668CA266451363352D22DBEFD24221ED5A9EB621D5542E5311974D
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678551348412
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163458642003483033681FE9D7D2F668CA266451363352D22DBEFD24221ED5A9EB621D5542E5311974D