Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-11 00:45:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EF37E84E90611D2C09E0C4783A129C16AF3F47946953BBDC410C1EBA376C23D5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The review admits that it was lacking in data for many vulnerable groups, and that the findings in it can't necessarily be applied to everyone. https://www.bmj.com/content/380/bmj-2022-074224

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1634211842779144192
  • participantId - EF37E84E90611D2C09E0C4783A129C16AF3F47946953BBDC410C1EBA376C23D5
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678495530262
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1634211842779144192EF37E84E90611D2C09E0C4783A129C16AF3F47946953BBDC410C1EBA376C23D5