Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-10 18:38:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C783C8A55F2EA08E0CA4633DC4FB6C8E549FB0061D3D8933AAF3FF0A4D83FA2C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The review admits that it was lacking in data for many vulnerable groups, and that the findings in it can't necessarily be applied to everyone. https://www.bmj.com/content/380/bmj-2022-074224

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1634211842779144192
  • participantId - C783C8A55F2EA08E0CA4633DC4FB6C8E549FB0061D3D8933AAF3FF0A4D83FA2C
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678473532982
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1634211842779144192C783C8A55F2EA08E0CA4633DC4FB6C8E549FB0061D3D8933AAF3FF0A4D83FA2C