Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-12 06:56:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 909ADD9BABCA594A0988DCDD13FE0CEAE6AEC3FC1E3F9D10B6DCE528DA3CBE73
Participant Details

Original Note:

The review admits that it was lacking in data for many vulnerable groups, and that the findings in it can't necessarily be applied to everyone. https://www.bmj.com/content/380/bmj-2022-074224

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1634211842779144192
  • participantId - 909ADD9BABCA594A0988DCDD13FE0CEAE6AEC3FC1E3F9D10B6DCE528DA3CBE73
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678604183771
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1634211842779144192909ADD9BABCA594A0988DCDD13FE0CEAE6AEC3FC1E3F9D10B6DCE528DA3CBE73