Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-10 18:35:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 36F186BA17FE9417411C1F291FD67D4C81C43CC42BDE3C7B803B83EF522BFB86
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet merely proposes an ethical argument against defacing two flags representing two different ideas, not making misleading claims about the legality of flag burning or destruction on public property.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1634210841993125896
  • participantId - 36F186BA17FE9417411C1F291FD67D4C81C43CC42BDE3C7B803B83EF522BFB86
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678473337699
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163421084199312589636F186BA17FE9417411C1F291FD67D4C81C43CC42BDE3C7B803B83EF522BFB86