Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-10 10:54:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 488543D90BB779771049567F796159C48F29F8BF7F26CB4F1C53D9571C418389
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note that says there's no China or Russia sources does not address the actual tweet as the Tweet does not mention specific sources. So the note is not needed. The Tweet as written is correct and repeating a question in the hearing.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1634007490923991040
  • participantId - 488543D90BB779771049567F796159C48F29F8BF7F26CB4F1C53D9571C418389
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678445675581
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1634007490923991040488543D90BB779771049567F796159C48F29F8BF7F26CB4F1C53D9571C418389