Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-10 14:31:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 45B8EF43682258D990F1C39DD9C1C131E030B7B116A1A874CAD37AED55F98C04
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note that says there's no China or Russia sources does not address the actual tweet as the Tweet does not mention specific sources. So the note is not needed. The Tweet as written is correct and repeating a question in the hearing.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1634007490923991040
  • participantId - 45B8EF43682258D990F1C39DD9C1C131E030B7B116A1A874CAD37AED55F98C04
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678458665737
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163400749092399104045B8EF43682258D990F1C39DD9C1C131E030B7B116A1A874CAD37AED55F98C04