Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-10 01:16:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E343F092F0B44A6E8DEC7F3A16DFE90A5DA9F420CB1B9EDE2292D0B45E00C827
Participant Details

Original Note:

Notes explaining why they didn’t denounce it don’t dispute the fact that they didn’t denounce it. The two sentence statement is what they were asked to sign. They did not. Tweet states factual claim. Arguments supporting their reasons for not signing should go in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1633950194386735104
  • participantId - E343F092F0B44A6E8DEC7F3A16DFE90A5DA9F420CB1B9EDE2292D0B45E00C827
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678410997575
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1633950194386735104E343F092F0B44A6E8DEC7F3A16DFE90A5DA9F420CB1B9EDE2292D0B45E00C827