Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-09 05:57:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3B8390544CCD9665BD65037015542C966D1984AAFF5A5EED2A00E490D7E59C0F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is interpreting the attached video—an opinion. As the tweet includes the unedited video of the alleged evidence, the user provides sufficient context for users to come to their own conclusion. The onus of interpreting the implications of the evidence rests on the user.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1633697210352140289
  • participantId - 3B8390544CCD9665BD65037015542C966D1984AAFF5A5EED2A00E490D7E59C0F
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678341464572
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16336972103521402893B8390544CCD9665BD65037015542C966D1984AAFF5A5EED2A00E490D7E59C0F