Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-10 03:16:49 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9DF2B90CF1C5F23C075B6C5E98DEB067B30D8C9EDBEC08F592C35145D586663C
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no evidence for any of the claims made in this tweet. No evidence that the J6 committee misled anyone. No evidence that they withheld information relevant to any of the court cases involving J6 defendants. Court records show defendants had access to all footage. https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-january-6-jacob-chansley-tucker-carlson-193191103193

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1633334508463480833
  • participantId - 9DF2B90CF1C5F23C075B6C5E98DEB067B30D8C9EDBEC08F592C35145D586663C
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678418209922
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16333345084634808339DF2B90CF1C5F23C075B6C5E98DEB067B30D8C9EDBEC08F592C35145D586663C