Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-08 06:34:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 59B58389CFA816C0D40362A5483564FE05878705927CF37EA539EB648435F23C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet misrepresents the WSJ article; as the article explains, the FTC sought to determine what kind of access the journalists were granted in order to determine whether Twitter was acting in compliance with a 2022 order requiring Twitter to protect user data. https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/2023062C4316TwitterModifiedOrder.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1633270093164732416
  • participantId - 59B58389CFA816C0D40362A5483564FE05878705927CF37EA539EB648435F23C
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678257265447
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163327009316473241659B58389CFA816C0D40362A5483564FE05878705927CF37EA539EB648435F23C