Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-08 10:48:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E88A3C0DA471C9F4F010E683E4A7EA19416D2FC2C04863B2E7625C1C2FBE4A1D
Participant Details

Original Note:

If the fellow truly "did no actual work" then he would be in violation of his employment contract - shouldn't that be verified by the legal and HR teams of Twitter? Otherwise it's just hearsay that can hurt this man's reputation and ability to work again.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1633150507396247554
  • participantId - E88A3C0DA471C9F4F010E683E4A7EA19416D2FC2C04863B2E7625C1C2FBE4A1D
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678272493946
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1633150507396247554E88A3C0DA471C9F4F010E683E4A7EA19416D2FC2C04863B2E7625C1C2FBE4A1D