Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-07 18:23:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 735CE5611F5264FE2F168B39682A44DCD6EE4049C3EFC07F6A5E8E13C85D4B88
Participant Details

Original Note:

If the fellow truly "did no actual work" then he would be in violation of his employment contract - shouldn't that be verified by the legal and HR teams of Twitter? Otherwise it's just hearsay that can hurt this man's reputation and ability to work again.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1633150507396247554
  • participantId - 735CE5611F5264FE2F168B39682A44DCD6EE4049C3EFC07F6A5E8E13C85D4B88
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678213418828
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1633150507396247554735CE5611F5264FE2F168B39682A44DCD6EE4049C3EFC07F6A5E8E13C85D4B88