Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-07 17:14:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3B4EB1D0E258C4B89A9EC493EAE6F7F3338AC86C27926D73FE05A59E86581ADF
Participant Details

Original Note:

If the fellow truly "did no actual work" then he would be in violation of his employment contract - shouldn't that be verified by the legal and HR teams of Twitter? Otherwise it's just hearsay that can hurt this man's reputation and ability to work again.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1633150507396247554
  • participantId - 3B4EB1D0E258C4B89A9EC493EAE6F7F3338AC86C27926D73FE05A59E86581ADF
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678209251110
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16331505073962475543B4EB1D0E258C4B89A9EC493EAE6F7F3338AC86C27926D73FE05A59E86581ADF