Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-07 17:07:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C21467E641EBA9B166CED9E72ECB4B3AF6303A8D0BDE4C7CA7EC0ABB824B5B32
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a fairly confidential matter, and a fairly personal view. There aren't any decent sources to indicate it's misinformation, and additional context that could be added is quite limited. Note not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1633149774596636675
  • participantId - C21467E641EBA9B166CED9E72ECB4B3AF6303A8D0BDE4C7CA7EC0ABB824B5B32
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678208863713
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1633149774596636675C21467E641EBA9B166CED9E72ECB4B3AF6303A8D0BDE4C7CA7EC0ABB824B5B32