Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-07 17:16:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 66FEF8D22C4EBF91771B3A37FB22EEF0678F7B006F2EA48E734B0BB092DFE44C
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a fairly confidential matter, and a fairly personal view. There aren't any decent sources to indicate it's misinformation, and additional context that could be added is quite limited. Note not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1633149774596636675
  • participantId - 66FEF8D22C4EBF91771B3A37FB22EEF0678F7B006F2EA48E734B0BB092DFE44C
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678209414526
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163314977459663667566FEF8D22C4EBF91771B3A37FB22EEF0678F7B006F2EA48E734B0BB092DFE44C