Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-07 17:05:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 48F3FB3924371079B5948A129825AD2B4E6A045A7C42DC4EA9B436C954805F69
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a fairly confidential matter, and a fairly personal view. There aren't any decent sources to indicate it's misinformation, and additional context that could be added is quite limited. Note not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1633149774596636675
  • participantId - 48F3FB3924371079B5948A129825AD2B4E6A045A7C42DC4EA9B436C954805F69
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678208700327
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163314977459663667548F3FB3924371079B5948A129825AD2B4E6A045A7C42DC4EA9B436C954805F69