Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-09 12:15:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3E8FC6102EE5A69D5D6B5F002C48B2720F4B3E92FCA40CE76CC4BD73B3B29DDD
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a fairly confidential matter, and a fairly personal view. There aren't any decent sources to indicate it's misinformation, and additional context that could be added is quite limited. Note not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1633149774596636675
  • participantId - 3E8FC6102EE5A69D5D6B5F002C48B2720F4B3E92FCA40CE76CC4BD73B3B29DDD
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678364101158
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16331497745966366753E8FC6102EE5A69D5D6B5F002C48B2720F4B3E92FCA40CE76CC4BD73B3B29DDD