Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-07 21:11:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0ADF09BACA1E9B3B5D9C60F7389399CB6DBC53F444EB173C59DF1CE9A59C208F
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a fairly confidential matter, and a fairly personal view. There aren't any decent sources to indicate it's misinformation, and additional context that could be added is quite limited. Note not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1633149774596636675
  • participantId - 0ADF09BACA1E9B3B5D9C60F7389399CB6DBC53F444EB173C59DF1CE9A59C208F
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678223502940
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16331497745966366750ADF09BACA1E9B3B5D9C60F7389399CB6DBC53F444EB173C59DF1CE9A59C208F