Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-09 23:32:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D4EA906BE64F0CFDAF46E90CE6B806739F575C8D52AB9E5C7CF82FCD9A650D58
Participant Details

Original Note:

The word egregious is subjective and leads the reader to believe that the tweet is a response to a factual account, which it is not. The Newsweek article is opinion that contains factual errors and it is irresponsible for such a well respected public figure to endorse it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1632907456182353920
  • participantId - D4EA906BE64F0CFDAF46E90CE6B806739F575C8D52AB9E5C7CF82FCD9A650D58
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678404750586
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1632907456182353920D4EA906BE64F0CFDAF46E90CE6B806739F575C8D52AB9E5C7CF82FCD9A650D58