Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-03-06 14:51:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 62ED08CF2EC5B7F0F80869A6D55C59FE79D6011AB28A81D041B0D2F771BA4670
Participant Details
Original Note:
The statement is not defamatory because the only factual statement in the quoted articles is true - that Mr. Knowles said what he said. How to interpret what he said is an opinion based on a disclosed fact, and thus not actionable. https://www.rcfp.org/two-courts-reaffirm-protections-opinions-based-disclosed-facts/ https://www.virginiadefamationlawyer.com/implied-undisclosed-facts-as-basis-for-defamation-claim/ https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-alnd-1_07-cv-01255/pdf/USCOURTS-alnd-1_07-cv-01255-0.pdf
All Note Details