Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-09 13:41:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5D2146D6FC86D40EA2E41844C0C66D8B205EF79FA2E47C56C026A356E1CEBAD5
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is this person's opinion on the case. Nothing suggests they don't understand the self-defense veredict. People can and do frequently express their frustration towards juridical decisions they disagree with. Needs no note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1632194773485338624
  • participantId - 5D2146D6FC86D40EA2E41844C0C66D8B205EF79FA2E47C56C026A356E1CEBAD5
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678369260717
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16321947734853386245D2146D6FC86D40EA2E41844C0C66D8B205EF79FA2E47C56C026A356E1CEBAD5