Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-04 21:31:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B5FEE1C7F02671E2466AE0184315222BE9F827034DA0D608839BE86F8B7D554A
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no scientific basis for earthquake prediction. Earthquakes are always possible in areas with active faults, but specific forecasts perform no better than random when tested. The "predicted" areas here are some of the world's most seismically active regions. https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-you-predict-earthquakes https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/earthquakes/earthquakes-probabilities https://pnsn.org/outreach/faq/earthquake-prediction https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2019/predicting-next-big-earthquake/ https://www.vice.com/en/article/kz4jyz/earthquake-conspiracy-theorists-are-wreaking-havoc-during-emergencies https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/can-you-predict-an-earthquake/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1632077219060416512
  • participantId - B5FEE1C7F02671E2466AE0184315222BE9F827034DA0D608839BE86F8B7D554A
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1677965467103
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1632077219060416512B5FEE1C7F02671E2466AE0184315222BE9F827034DA0D608839BE86F8B7D554A