Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-04 22:50:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 66E65E029587E0660CB3BCDC294F69822E9AB36998D880C702CD1B4414D20A3F
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no scientific basis for earthquake prediction. Earthquakes are always possible in areas with active faults, but specific forecasts perform no better than random when tested. The "predicted" areas here are some of the world's most seismically active regions. https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-you-predict-earthquakes https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/earthquakes/earthquakes-probabilities https://pnsn.org/outreach/faq/earthquake-prediction https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2019/predicting-next-big-earthquake/ https://www.vice.com/en/article/kz4jyz/earthquake-conspiracy-theorists-are-wreaking-havoc-during-emergencies https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/can-you-predict-an-earthquake/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1632077219060416512
  • participantId - 66E65E029587E0660CB3BCDC294F69822E9AB36998D880C702CD1B4414D20A3F
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1677970230012
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163207721906041651266E65E029587E0660CB3BCDC294F69822E9AB36998D880C702CD1B4414D20A3F