Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-28 05:54:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 47A084707DE81F161BB9815A58666DDC273F1A0D39BD77038957C255FD78EB46
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet doesn't claim the lab leak hypothesis is 100% true. It claims labeling it a conspiracy theory is incorrect. The natural origin theory was also assessed at "low confidence." The only org that had higher than low confidence was the FBI - finding lab leak most likely. https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-origin-china-lab-leak-807b7b0a?mod=hp_lead_pos4

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1630243360697905153
  • participantId - 47A084707DE81F161BB9815A58666DDC273F1A0D39BD77038957C255FD78EB46
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1677563691570
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163024336069790515347A084707DE81F161BB9815A58666DDC273F1A0D39BD77038957C255FD78EB46