Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-27 20:29:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B9D89A3C876E140F346448C50316FDFA489E716A27EFC68E0CCEE9AC01E86BB3
Participant Details

Original Note:

* The evidence that DOE has is relatively weak and its conclusion made with "low confidence" * The DOE shared the info with other agencies, but none changed their conclusions * Zoonosis at Huanan market is consistent with available scientific evidence https://twitter.com/angie_rasmussen/status/1629938451628843010

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1630233734757720064
  • participantId - B9D89A3C876E140F346448C50316FDFA489E716A27EFC68E0CCEE9AC01E86BB3
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1677529780234
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1630233734757720064B9D89A3C876E140F346448C50316FDFA489E716A27EFC68E0CCEE9AC01E86BB3