Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-01 16:27:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7F21DB959A295247DC1E334C4CB153A6A5769C34F84754E3BA9C0E4D1BDCA558
Participant Details

Original Note:

Two agencies have concluded the origin to be the lab.. the “low confidence” argument comes from a secondary source specifically people who have read the conclusion and who are making an argument… that is just an opinion of a secondary source! The primary source is what matters…

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1630079386287476736
  • participantId - 7F21DB959A295247DC1E334C4CB153A6A5769C34F84754E3BA9C0E4D1BDCA558
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1677688022992
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16300793862874767367F21DB959A295247DC1E334C4CB153A6A5769C34F84754E3BA9C0E4D1BDCA558