Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-27 04:38:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FC36FD2F9474B81DFF8A1CFDBA500C43C5AE6A6B9FD3FF78C947B7ADF9B9E448
Participant Details

Original Note:

While individual opinions about the proper reading of the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution differ widely, and have for generations, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that it does protect an individual right to bear arms (with certain limitations). https://www.oyez.org/cases/2007/07-290

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1630018506224721920
  • participantId - FC36FD2F9474B81DFF8A1CFDBA500C43C5AE6A6B9FD3FF78C947B7ADF9B9E448
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1677472683936
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1630018506224721920FC36FD2F9474B81DFF8A1CFDBA500C43C5AE6A6B9FD3FF78C947B7ADF9B9E448