Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-05 08:58:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8D0F9D904D8DA05FCFB9192043E4440C9B5169AEAC1A12D94EEE39E40B95F6B8
Participant Details

Original Note:

While individual opinions about the proper reading of the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution differ widely, and have for generations, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that it does protect an individual right to bear arms (with certain limitations). https://www.oyez.org/cases/2007/07-290

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1630018506224721920
  • participantId - 8D0F9D904D8DA05FCFB9192043E4440C9B5169AEAC1A12D94EEE39E40B95F6B8
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678006716359
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16300185062247219208D0F9D904D8DA05FCFB9192043E4440C9B5169AEAC1A12D94EEE39E40B95F6B8