Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-27 22:14:26 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1DED781F976423F3EB71D3A23C0D8CEE7461E517C43E57C74A8DD7C0F25B3435
Participant Details

Original Note:

While individual opinions about the proper reading of the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution differ widely, and have for generations, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that it does protect an individual right to bear arms (with certain limitations). https://www.oyez.org/cases/2007/07-290

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1630018506224721920
  • participantId - 1DED781F976423F3EB71D3A23C0D8CEE7461E517C43E57C74A8DD7C0F25B3435
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1677536066161
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16300185062247219201DED781F976423F3EB71D3A23C0D8CEE7461E517C43E57C74A8DD7C0F25B3435