Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-26 20:54:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4CB9CC085F5F9617E7929CAD11DC8CE2CCDB707A6B18BF0A628CDB38C4F2EC29
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet presents as a statement of fact. Contrary argument is properly conducted in the Comments. No note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1629922953793093637
  • participantId - 4CB9CC085F5F9617E7929CAD11DC8CE2CCDB707A6B18BF0A628CDB38C4F2EC29
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1677444858015
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16299229537930936374CB9CC085F5F9617E7929CAD11DC8CE2CCDB707A6B18BF0A628CDB38C4F2EC29