Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-26 20:43:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E8371E1A4AB18CD3D44F8F0C8C7B474130E067F31781CC912350C9BD74198216
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a network news broadcast with a doctor expressing his opinion about a study that exists. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202209.0430/v2 Many doctors disagree with each other and the validity of various studies. People can debate whether it is a good or bad study in comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1629885426168217601
  • participantId - E8371E1A4AB18CD3D44F8F0C8C7B474130E067F31781CC912350C9BD74198216
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1677444196081
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1629885426168217601E8371E1A4AB18CD3D44F8F0C8C7B474130E067F31781CC912350C9BD74198216