Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-26 19:53:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1B2E9023B29A7F1B2D8E7505F3CFFF7168CFDCFCD7999FE4A303CF5F619C8EFC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Did you just fact check the WSJ with the WSJ

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1629882278225539072
  • participantId - 1B2E9023B29A7F1B2D8E7505F3CFFF7168CFDCFCD7999FE4A303CF5F619C8EFC
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1677441219262
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16298822782255390721B2E9023B29A7F1B2D8E7505F3CFFF7168CFDCFCD7999FE4A303CF5F619C8EFC