Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-25 04:33:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DD5793EDD2FDB9D4B279EEB835E36ABCF6776DFF70562C018B9DBA024E96092C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court of the United States has made it clear with several landmark rulings that the Second Amendment of the U.S. constitution protects all bearable arms with lawful uses, even those not in existence at the time of the ratification of the Bill of Rights. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller?searchToken=9qe43vtbec00pedn020sid535 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_State_Rifle_%26_Pistol_Association,_Inc._v._Bruen https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caetano_v._Massachusetts

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1629206915468386304
  • participantId - DD5793EDD2FDB9D4B279EEB835E36ABCF6776DFF70562C018B9DBA024E96092C
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1677299608354
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1629206915468386304DD5793EDD2FDB9D4B279EEB835E36ABCF6776DFF70562C018B9DBA024E96092C