Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-23 14:37:36 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EE5D4DFF24D47C95DCD1C6604EBD8F9A035EA9DD38369E2139B0539367C31EF6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note arguing "Younger age groups have a statistically insignificant sampling" is based on misreading the of confidence intervals on chart (p. 147-148) This is addressed in the limitations (p. 149) "bivalent booster coverage has been low (17.5% among persons aged ≥12 years)"

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1628619825923735554
  • participantId - EE5D4DFF24D47C95DCD1C6604EBD8F9A035EA9DD38369E2139B0539367C31EF6
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1677163056289
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1628619825923735554EE5D4DFF24D47C95DCD1C6604EBD8F9A035EA9DD38369E2139B0539367C31EF6